211![12 Michigan Michigan tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, the same position it held in[removed]The state 12 Michigan Michigan tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, the same position it held in[removed]The state](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/e48a13e7a537e86f0204851f7e90c829.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:18
|
---|
212![18 Ohio Ohio ranked 18th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, earning a spot as one of this year’s most 18 Ohio Ohio ranked 18th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, earning a spot as one of this year’s most](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/14e81678a36522bbb8995b8d5bec4cbd.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:48
|
---|
213![4 Oregon Oregon ranked 4th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, the same position it held in[removed]The state 4 Oregon Oregon ranked 4th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, the same position it held in[removed]The state](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/ef46b296de7107d27e421d7e0ac46197.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:50
|
---|
214![2 California California ranked 2nd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, maintaining the same position 2 California California ranked 2nd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, maintaining the same position](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/c3ff0e270d1257a8e861635c521a171b.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:00:55
|
---|
215![39 Kentucky Kentucky tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three spots compared 39 Kentucky Kentucky tied for 39th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping three spots compared](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/3ff0bc81fff58be9a9eadcc50d09f816.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:11
|
---|
216![47 Alaska Alaska tied for 47th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight decrease from its position in 2012. 47 Alaska Alaska tied for 47th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, a slight decrease from its position in 2012.](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/2d6d75eb395d7d485959accbe897aa0a.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:00:54
|
---|
217![44 Nebraska Nebraska tied for 44th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping two spots compared to 44 Nebraska Nebraska tied for 44th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, dropping two spots compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/2d9d217c0cb9f3dc41ab396b5fa96afe.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:32
|
---|
218![22 Delaware Delaware ranked 22nd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising five spots compared to 22 Delaware Delaware ranked 22nd in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising five spots compared to](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/8e798f7116a4bde450ee64d73bd42a5a.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:00:59
|
---|
219![12 New Jersey New Jersey tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising four spots compared to 2012. 12 New Jersey New Jersey tied for 12th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, rising four spots compared to 2012.](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/76da00e606a4808913acbbeed34bf50a.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:39
|
---|
220![9 Maryland Maryland ranked 9th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, maintaining its 2012 position in the top ten 9 Maryland Maryland ranked 9th in the 2013 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, maintaining its 2012 position in the top ten](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/f954fb74454d2de463b94745e0070839.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.aceee.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-11-04 15:01:20
|
---|